Portrayal of the Lower Class :: Sociology

Portrayal of the Lower Class When the words poverty comes up what are the send-off things that come to mind. Usually the first thing thought of is the perception of a man with a torn skiing cap, tattered plaid jacket, dirty gloves, no shoes and living below a bridge. This is, like most stereotypes the extremity of the problem. The homeless you see on the street does not exemplify everyone in poverty. Most live in a very small apartment or complex with some food and water. Poverty by definition is the state of having little or no cash and few possessions. This definition even says that not all in poverty are without a home or food or even clothes, it precisely states that it is not a substantial amount. So how is it that new and everyone that is shown in poverty is always shown in rags on the corner? One motive is for the exact reason these passel are in this state, notes. Relief Organization and Companies raise millions if not billions of dollars a year on the aid o f the less fortunate. Is it really tangible to entrust that every drop of this money is going straight to these people? No, some of the money has to be going to patrons or even the fundraisers themselves. Even no-profit organizations spend money on bettering their own facilities. These people are not taking out enough money for thither to be a question, but money is addled in translation. I dont mean to sound like a pessimist, but most people in this world are looking to expedite there way into money. What better way than to pluck the strings of another ones heart and have them willingly give you money? You might ask yourself how this plays into the role of stereotyping, its locomote into affect when the media and government gets involved. Media sets up a portrayal of people who are poor and misfortunate as having absolutely nothing so that generous people will want to give more. As seen in hurricane Katrina, the media only showed riots in the street, African Americans l ooting stores, and people will no clothes on rest in the middle of the street in knee-deep water. You might want to know how embezzlers, the government and the media both have an impact on the stereotype of poverty.

Human Influenced Climate Change :: Global Warming Essays

Arguments Against Climate ChangeThese are some of the arguments used to prevent in effect(p) achievement on humor qualifying.Climate change is not occurringThis was the original argument used by the carbon industry to discredit climate change and globose warming.Today the vast majority of world experts on climatic issues agree that it is changing, and that the evidence is there for everyone to witness.Climate change is good for usA more than recent argument used by the carbon industry to confuse the issue of climate change and global warming with the intention of stopping effective action on climate change. Their approach falls into two categories1. CO2 fertilisationThis concept relates to the fact that CO2 is sometimes a limiting ingathering factor for plants. The theory goes that with increases in atmospheric CO2 our agriculture will become more more productive.However, the storms, floods, fire and drought that are already contend havoc with agriculture are likely to have a significant negative impact, along with the longer term flooding of coastal areas.2. Some move of the world will be better to live inIn theory some parts of the world might benefit, from a human headland of view, due to global warming. However, at current rates of warming, local ecosystems will collapse and any objective measure of global benefits versus suffering would show much more suffering than benefits gained.Climate change is natural, therefore we should do nothingClimate change is natural and natural climate change is occurring constantly. However, natural climate change has been overtaken by human induced climate change which is causing the majority of climate change we are seeing today.Even if the climate change we are seeing today was totally natural, the disastrous impact is already being felt.Its unclear how much of todays climate change is caused by humans, therefore we dont authentically know if we should do anythingSimilar to the above argument and equally nons ensical. We can see and feel the impacts of our changing climate and we should do something about it regardless of the cause.The climate has been much hotter/colder in the other(prenominal)This argument suggests that because the climate has been more extreme in the past we shouldnt worry about it changing. It conveniently ignores the fact that if we reached either past climate extreme, much of our society and ecology would not survive.Climate change has been faster in the pastWell it hasnt for the last 800,000 years. Ice core information shows that the fastest rate of CO2 increase over the last 800,000 years was 30 ppm in 1000 years.

Physics of Black Holes :: physics science space

What are Black Holes?A black hole is theorized to be a collection of collapsed matter of whose gravitational pull is so loyal that not even light can escape its force. The matter is is forced in a very, very tiny area and therefore the matter is very dense. Since light cannot escape, they are considered to be truly black. This, obviously, makes it hard to detect an actual black hole, and therefore, have only been theorizd to exist. These theories are slowly turning into conclusive show. This evidence includes the particle dust given off from matter entering the black hole, as well as observations of orbits of bodies near the black hole.Black holes are commonly formed after supernova explosions, in which the remnants of this explosion implodes within itself. It will continue to condense to a volume of zero and infinite density. This is discernn as a singularity. How do we know?HistoryKarl Swarzschild first came up with the concept of black holes in 1916. This was based upon Einst eins theory of relativity. The Swarzschild radius is the radius where the escape velocity equals the recreate of light. The Swarzschild radius can be calculated using the escape velocity equationvesc = (2GM/R)1/2Substituting the speed of light for the vR = 2GM/c2If you notice, the Swarzschild radius is only dependent upon the mass of the body. Anything that enters this radius will not exit, due to the tremendous come up of gravitational pull.So, How do we know?Again, as mentioned earlier, we cant directly observe a black hole. We can, however, make observations to the surroundings around the black hole. It used to be that theorists were the only scientific persons who acknowledged an worldly concern of black holes, however, today, the story is quite different. The popular idea today is that black holes do exist and are common in all the galaxies so out-of-the-way(prenominal) investigated. One reason is Einsteins theory of General Relativity. This theory accounts for the existenc e of black holes, and if they do not exist, then the General Relativity theories by Einstein would be wrong. Considering all the tests and experiements done to date to try and disprove this theory have all been rejected, this seems unlikely. Also, scientists today look for high concentration of mass in a small area. Calculations and technology allow this to happen. Another factor in proving the existence of black holes is the Hubble Space Telescope. The Hubble Space Telescope has accumulated a large amount of data and information supporting the existence of black holes.

The Normality of my Family Essay -- Essays Papers

The Normality of my Family According to The American Heritage Dictionary the word normal means conforming with, adhering to, or constituting a norm, standard, pattern, level or type typical.However, in the culture we live in, these standards, patterns, levels, and types vary drastically. What is considered normal in one region, state, city, neighborhood, or even out household maybe completely different in another. As Americans we shargon many traditions, customs, values and views, and at the same time, we all live very differently that is what makes this nation so great. Most people depend to consider their knowledge lifestyle, to be perfectly normal, even if it is nothing like that of someone else. So if we all live so differently, what is normal and who defines it? I was brought up in the town of Smallville, USA. Smallville is the kind of place were almost everyone knows each other, and familiar faces are always everywhere. Friday night football games are about the most elicit thing to happen all week. There is only one grocery store, a few stop lights, and all two lane roads, many of which are dirt.To me, this is completely normal, but that is because it is what I am utilise to. Until now, it was all I had ever known. I had lived in Ortonville all my life. A few days past my city slicker room mate and I were out running around.We were not far from my hometown so we decided to make a slight detour so she could see where I was from. We drove through the tiny downtown of Ortonville, past my High School, and by my house. She was amazed. To her, it was like being up northShe even compared it to being like her Grandparents cottage in the upper peninsula.She kept cracking jokes about cows out numbering people and such.We both got a... ...ir relationship as normal. In way they kind of reminds me of Tammy, from People Like Us. Tammy put her families relationship on the line at times so that she could provide for them. sometimes I feel that way about my parent s. I get the feeling that they think that providing us with a nice house, new cars, and fancy furniture is more important than their happiness. I would love to see my parents do things like go on dates, cuddle, and even just talk about things other than business. To answer my own question, what is normal and who defines it, I would just like to say that normality is something that everyone defines for themselves. We all have different views on what is normal. Normality is just what you know, what you were brought up with, what you are used to. It is everything and anything you want it to be, and that is why it is such a wonderful thing.

The Social Model of Mental Illness Essay -- Psychiatry Psychology Pape

The Social Model of Mental IllnessThe hearty model of psychological illness emphasizes the social environment and the roles people play. Thomas Scheff maintains that people diagnosed as mentally ill are victims of the status quo, guilty of often unnamed violations of social norms thus the label mental illness can be used as an instrument of social control. I agree with Scheffs analysis, and I strongly match with the view Thomas Szasz takes on the notion of mental illness. Szasz argues that much of what we call mental illness is a myth it is not an illness, but simply problems in living, troubles caused by conflicting personal needs, opinions, social aspirations, values, and so forth (Szasz 13). It thus follows that the widely accepted medical model of mental illness is inherently flawed that mental illness should, then, certainly not be treated much like physical illness. Szasz is extremely critical of contemporary psychiatry as a discipline, arguing that psychiatrists are n ot benign professionals helping to liberate individuals and improve their lives by diagnosing and treating mental illnesses, but instead act as agents of social control silencing, stigmatizing and dehumanizing people who disturb the prevailing social order. Every society rewards conformity those with more serious problems in living often do a very poor job of conforming, and are punished accordingly. In Ideology and Insanity Essays on the Psychiatric Dehumanization of Man, Thomas Szasz writes that on the unity hand, by seeking relief from the burden of his moral responsibilities, man mystifies and technicizes his problems in living...on the other hand, the demand for help thus generated is now met by a behavioral tec... ...s in trying to understand and properly treat what is known as mental illness, we should give some credibility and responsibility back to those who are label mentally ill, looking to them for ideas, for suggestions, for guidance. Those who have more severe problems in living (as well as their families and/or friends) may know more about their dilemma than those who do not, and may be able to propose, indirectly or directly, remedies that may alleviate their unfortunate plight. BibliographyAwake Magazine. Hope for the Mentally Ill. September 8, 1986 ed, pgs.3-10. Watchtower Bible & leaflet Society of New York, Inc, 1986.Kaysen, Susanna. Girl, Interrupted. Turtle Bay Books. New York, NY, 1993.Szasz, Thomas. Ideology and Insanity Essays on the Psychiatric Dehumanization of Man. Syracuse University Press. Syracuse, NY, 1991

The Social Model of Mental Illness Essay -- Psychiatry Psychology Pape

The Social Model of Mental IllnessThe neighborly model of mental disease emphasizes the social environment and the roles people play. Thomas Scheff maintains that people diagnosed as mentally ill are victims of the status quo, guilty of often unnamed violations of social norms and then the label mental illness can be used as an instrument of social control. I agree with Scheffs analysis, and I strongly concur with the locating Thomas Szasz takes on the notion of mental illness. Szasz argues that much of what we call mental illness is a myth it is not an illness, but simply problems in nutrition, troubles caused by conflicting personal needs, opinions, social aspirations, values, and so forth (Szasz 13). It thus follows that the widely accepted medical model of mental illness is inherently flaw that mental illness should, then, certainly not be treated much like physical illness. Szasz is extremely critical of contemporary psychiatry as a discipline, arguing that psychiatr ists are not benign professionals helping to liberate individuals and improve their lives by diagnosing and treating mental illnesses, but instead act as agents of social control silencing, stigmatizing and dehumanizing people who disturb the prevailing social order. Every society rewards conformity those with more serious problems in living often do a very poor job of conforming, and are punished accordingly. In Ideology and Insanity Essays on the Psychiatric Dehumanization of Man, Thomas Szasz writes that on the one hand, by seeking relief from the burden of his moral responsibilities, man mystifies and technicizes his problems in living...on the other hand, the demand for help thus generated is now met by a behavioral tec... ...s in trying to understand and properly treat what is known as mental illness, we should give some credibility and responsibility back to those who are labeled mentally ill, looking to them for ideas, for suggestions, for guidance. Those w ho have more severe problems in living (as well as their families and/or friends) may know more about their predicament than those who do not, and may be able to propose, indirectly or directly, remedies that may alleviate their unfortunate plight. BibliographyAwake Magazine. Hope for the Mentally Ill. September 8, 1986 ed, pgs.3-10. Watchtower Bible & Tract fraternity of New York, Inc, 1986.Kaysen, Susanna. Girl, Interrupted. Turtle Bay Books. New York, NY, 1993.Szasz, Thomas. Ideology and Insanity Essays on the Psychiatric Dehumanization of Man. Syracuse University Press. Syracuse, NY, 1991